Background Image
Previous Page  83 / 128 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 83 / 128 Next Page
Page Background

3. In the later stages of the war General Monash had devised a new

type of advance that involved a staggered movement forward in

stages that allowed your artillery to continue firing without hitting

your own troops. This allowed the AIF to get forward closer to the

final objective as seems to be the case in this description.

4. Carrying a digging utensil and a sand bag with you was important

because it allowed you to “dig in” if necessary.

5. Obviously, soldiers returning home either during or after the war,

often returned home requiring continuing medical assistance.

18. The

distance between opposing trenches

varied according to the

terrain but always favoured the defenders. Thus while the two hundred

metre distance between the trenches made the Australian troops at

Fromelles undertake a ridiculous and murderous attack by inexperienced

troops, the attack at Pozieres, while a successful fifty metre gain, was

unacceptable in terms of Australian casualties.

At Pozieres a lengthy artillery barrage had forewarned Germans of the

timing and positioning of the attack. In addition, the AIF found a deep and

elaborate trench system that meant that they were able to capture the

initial trenches with comparative ease but they had greater difficulty

capturing the later trenches. Unlike the wide “no man’s land” at

Fromelles that made success impossible, the gain at Pozieres was possible

over 50 metres but still was gained by unacceptable losses in manpower.

19.

Killed and Lost

The trench system and the weaponry used ensured

that families at home were never completely sure where their sons were

buried during the war, if they were buried at all. In particular, the failure

of both sides to sanction any burial system for soldiers killed in no man’s

land meant they many soldiers were killed and “lost.”

One process introduced occurred as soldiers moved forward to the line or

the most forward of the AIF’s trenches. A soldier gave an officer in the

communication trench his personal possessions, including in some cases

wills, so that if he didn’t return his most valuable items could be returned

to his family in Australia.

The

Red Cross

and the

Commonwealth War Graves Commission

were

set up to address that issue, but the military graves still consist of plaques

to signify the ‘death but not found’ situation of the many AIF soldiers. It

is not just the Commonwealth forces that suffered this way; imagine how

German families felt when their sons were ‘atomised’ at Messines.

81