Background Image
Previous Page  61 / 128 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 61 / 128 Next Page
Page Background

Why was Australia so supportive of the War?

Considering the events in the timeline the sense of duty and maintaining

strong links with the British monarchy and reliance on British naval

power meant that Australia was very supportive of the war. This is unlike

any modern day situation where Australians would likely be much more

sceptical and less willing to sacrifice our soldiers in pointless battles.

“Genuine” Australians did have a different attitude to their allies

capabilities in the war but overall still were very supportive of Britain and

willing to sustain their support in the face of considerable losses.

However, by the end of the war Australian troops were happy to have

Australian officers and commanders leading them into battle. This can be

demonstrated towards the end of the war when Monash says of the

Tommy (British) soldiers lack of effort at Villers Bretonneux “ not worth

the money it costs to put them into uniform” - Carlyon Page 585.

BATTLES OF WORLD WAR 1 ON THE WESTERN FRONT

Open flat ground, machine guns, pillboxes placed on high ground and

deadly artillery fire produced killing fields for Australians in the early

days of their participation in battles on the Western Front.

On the 19th July,1916, the Australian 5

th

Division, lacking local battle

experience and because they had only just arrived in the area, experienced

the poor use of supporting artillery fire and with a wide area of “No

Man’s Land”, suffered heavy losses without gaining any ground at the

Battle of Fromelles. The Australians suffered 5533 casualties, with nearly

2,000 killed in action. This constitutes our greatest military losses in a

military engagement in a 24 hour period, according to the Australian War

Memorial.

In one day Australian troops lost more men than any war Australian

soldiers have been involved in before and since.

Before the battle the 15

th

brigade commander General H. E. Elliott, aware

that his Brigade was inexperienced, and that a concrete protected series of

positioned machine guns at a high point called Sugar Loaf dominated the

area of “No Man’s Land”, had attempted to persuade the British command

to call off the attack. This he was unable to do, and consequently Elliott

saw his brigade decimated as Corporal Kyle Knynett wrote “ If you

gathered together the stock of a thousand butcher’s shops, cut it into a

59