Background Image
Previous Page  22 / 128 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 128 Next Page
Page Background

many victories against the Ottoman Empire and prompted their leader

Harry Chauvel writing to his wife “ my men put up a performance which

is beyond all precedence”.

However, by 1918 even on the Western Front, the AIF soldiers had

developed, from their experience, and the knowledge of Australian

officers like General Monash, a more strategic and disciplined approach

that was still able to incorporate the ANZAC spirit. This ANZAC spirit

was developed through four years of adversity on the Western Front and

mate-ship generated in regional Australia, on long and exciting training

camps in Australia, on the long trips from Australia to Europe and Egypt

and in adventurous times in their overseas destination. It is important to

note that the AIF’s most important successes were at Villers Bretonneux

and Hamel and in the defence of Amiens under the leadership of an

Australian general, John Monash, towards the end of the war when they

applied lessons from experience and sacrifice learnt on battles on the

Western Front.

Tre

nch warfare in Europe was the final determinant in the development

of the ANZAC spirit. The horrors and adversities of the war in Europe

meant that you had to rely on your mates to survive and in some cases

a piece of shrapnel “took out” your mate standing next to you while you

weren’t even touched. This element of luck made your mate even more

precious.

Two other factors further strengthened this spirit; 80 percent of AIF

soldiers were single, meaning they had a different mind-set to any

group of married men, and being more highly paid than other allied

soldiers meant they had the means to “play up” more than other soldiers.

While conscription numbers had decreased in 1917/18, the AIF of 1918

was a different force from the AIF that left Australia in 1915. Gallipoli

had been an initial influence in this transformation, but Northern Europe

with its great losses ensured a more sober spirit amongst the AIF. As Les

Carlyon

The Great War

(Page 634) indicated, the AIF were more

respectful of their leaders “natural leaders ……...whose authority came

from who they were rather than badges of rank’. In many cases the

“Privates had become Captains” much more experienced in trench

warfare and aware of the need to protect the lives of those under their

command.

20